M&A Insurance 101: The Legal Risks of Buying or Selling a Company

Legal Risks of Buying or Selling a Company
Deposit Photos

The decision to buy or sell a company is often framed as a milestone moment—an expansion strategy coming to life or the culmination of years of building a business. Yet behind the headlines and valuation figures, mergers and acquisitions are legally complex transactions that involve significant risk extending well beyond the signing date. The challenge for business owners is not just closing the deal, but understanding what liabilities may follow afterward.

Even with experienced advisers and carefully drafted agreements, M&A transactions depend heavily on information provided before closing. Financial records, tax filings, regulatory permits, employee matters, and pending disputes all shape how a deal is priced and structured. When any of these disclosures turn out to be inaccurate or incomplete, disputes can arise long after ownership has changed hands, often when the stakes are highest and remedies are hardest to enforce.

This is where M&A insurance enters the conversation. Rather than eliminating risk altogether, it functions as a tool for reallocating certain legal and financial exposures associated with buying or selling a company. Understanding how this insurance works—and what it can and cannot protect against—can help business owners approach transactions with greater clarity.

Why Post-Closing Risk Remains After the Deal Is Signed

Many business owners assume that once a sale is completed, legal exposure largely falls away. The opposite is often true in practice. After closing, buyers begin operating the business and reviewing records more closely; in the process, they’re likely to uncover issues that were not apparent during negotiations. This is often when problems tied to taxes, compliance gaps, or undisclosed liabilities first come to light.

These risks typically trace back to representations and warranties in the transaction documents. Sellers make legally binding statements about the company’s condition, while buyers rely on those statements in agreeing to the deal. If a representation later proves incorrect, the buyer may seek compensation through indemnity claims or litigation. In the Philippine context, enforcing these remedies can be time-consuming and uncertain, especially if sellers have already distributed proceeds or are no longer actively involved in the business.

How M&A Insurance Changes Traditional Risk Allocation

Parties involved in these types of transactions typically rely on escrow arrangements or negotiated indemnity caps to manage post-closing risk. While these mechanisms provide some protection, they are often limited in duration and amount. M&A insurance, in contrast, involves transferring specific categories of risk to an insurer.

This shift can materially affect how the involved parties negotiate deals. Sellers may be able to limit ongoing exposure and achieve a cleaner exit, while buyers gain additional financial protection if losses arise from covered breaches. At the same time, insurance does not replace contractual protections or legal diligence. It instead operates alongside them, reinforcing the importance of careful documentation and clear allocation of responsibility under Philippine contract law.

Legal Issues Commonly Covered, and Those That Are Not

Not all risks discovered after closing carry the same legal weight, and not all of them are insurable. The most disruptive issues in many transactions are tied to areas that affect valuation directly, such as tax assessments, ownership of shares or assets, compliance with licensing requirements, or unresolved disputes. These are the specific types of exposures that M&A insurance is often designed to address, as long as they’re properly disclosed.

That said, coverage has clear boundaries. Known issues and forward-looking business risks, as well as matters arising from deliberate nondisclosure, typically excluded. Certain regulatory penalties or compliance failures may also fall outside the scope of coverage, particularly when Philippine laws impose strict or non-transferable obligations.

The Role of Due Diligence and Disclosure in Insurance Effectiveness

Insurance coverage is not a substitute for careful legal review. Insurers assess risk largely based on the depth and quality of the due diligence process, including how thoroughly financial, tax, labor, and regulatory matters have been examined. Weak or rushed diligence can result in narrower coverage and higher premiums, or exclusions that undermine the policy’s practical value.

Clear and accurate disclosure is equally important. Disclosure schedules form the foundation of both the transaction agreement and the insurance underwriting process. When disclosures are incomplete or inconsistent, insurers may deny claims even if a loss appears connected to a covered representation. In this way, M&A insurance encourages higher standards of documentation and transparency, which ultimately benefits both sides of the transaction.

Strategic Considerations for Buyers and Sellers

Organizations rarely decide to use M&A insurance from the jump. It often arises in competitive sale processes or transactions involving private equity exits. Organizations making deals with foreign counterparties unfamiliar with local regulatory risks also generally benefit from insurance. In these situations, it can help bridge gaps in risk tolerance and keep negotiations focused on value rather than worst-case scenarios when buying or selling a company.

Timing also matters. Because insurance terms are shaped by the deal structure and diligence findings, discussions typically need to begin early in the transaction process. Buyers and sellers generally benefit from treating insurance as a strategic planning too instead of a last-minute add-on. This way, they can align coverage with their broader legal and commercial objectives.

M&A insurance encourages business owners to shift the ways they think about risk and accountability. Rather than treating post-closing exposure as an unavoidable consequence of growth or exit, it invites a more deliberate approach to how businesses allocate and manage legal risk.

Find a Home-Based Business to Start-Up >>> Hundreds of Business Listings.

Spread the love